About Me

Basis Of Immigration Law
The grounds of immigration law are based on two concepts: right of the soil (jus soli) and right of blood (jus sanguinis). These two concepts are a recognized means of determining one's citizenship on principal, internationally. Simply put, a person's birthright could be determined by where they're born or where their ancestors were born. These two concepts are often intermingled whenever a nation is wanting to validate a person's right of citizenship in their home country and/or that of a foreign one. And while these two concepts are cut and dried, the act of legalizing someone as a citizen in a foreign country, especially that of the US has turned into a very controversial matter.

The question stands: on what basis should an immigrant be legalized as a US citizen?
As of 1965 once the nullification of ethnic quotas in immigration occurred there's been an influx in america. In fact this country gets the highest acceptance rate of legal immigrants as citizens. However, it also has the highest quantity of illegal immigrants as well, resulting in a demand for stricter immigration laws and closer adherence to the existing ones. This subject is split down the middle however, with recent arguments focusing on the power to the economy that illegal migrant workers give. The farming community especially, employs migrant workers, with lower wages, no taxes, hard workers who will do menial jobs that US workers don't want. In some ways though this is unethical in terms of worker rights-the employees reap all of the benefits while having to accomplish little for his or her workers.

To counteract the negativity surrounding the influx of illegal immigrants, the government of the United States has begun working towards a standard ground. One suggestion may be the policy of the guest worker. This calls for issuing prospective constituents with a visa which allows employers to temporarily hire such immigrants for specialize jobs. However, once employment is finished the worker must either reapply under another form of citizenship or find another job that falls of their visas guidelines. This involves quite a bit of red tape and will be very time consuming. Plus, it doesn't always go through- which makes this compromise somewhat unbalanced, leading to the continuation of illegal immigration.

In other ways the US has tried to uphold their immigration laws by blocking access to their borders. This included creating a 'wall' between your Mexico and US border. This however fell through as well and construction of the wall was stopped. The question is still posited-what is the best way to cope with immigration in the usa. It is obviously likely to lead in a change of immigration law, but which way will it sway? Towards leniency and compromise is apparently your best option. However, there is the popular opinion that stricter laws and closed borders would be the best option for the united states. Considering UK Immigration Lawyer california since it is, with immigration, the former seems to be the more practical, but how if the US handle this influx in population? Ultimately, those centered on immigration law appear to be at a standstill with regards to making a decision.